Freshly Laundered & Hanging Out to Dry: Chapter6, Part1
Freshly Laundered & Hanging Out to Dry. Part II
The Exoteric Phase:
That Which Is Seen
Mid-October to Christmas Break 1972

Chapter 6
The Course Begins
This work has service at its apex not as its foundation.
At its foundation it has understanding what our situation really is. _JG Bennett
It is Sunday, October 15, 1972, and the whole student body is gathered together in the ballroom for Mr. Bennett’s welcoming address. He sits on a chair while most of us are sitting on cushions scattered on the floor before him. The air is dense with expectation and quiet chatting. My one hundred and two classmates drift in, each finding a place to sit. Everyone has arrived, even the latecomers. While we wonder why Mr. B is not beginning, impatience is added to expectation. Finally, we realize he’s waiting for us to silence ourselves. At last, when we become fully attentive, he speaks with great deliberation, that British accent having an additional sound of authority to the American ear. Each of his long pauses underscores his weighing every thought before he says it aloud. The intermittent silences make some of us squirm.
He reminds us of all the reasons we’ve come here—rampant consumerism, dwindling resources, human greed and hunger for power, and the inability to put into practice spiritual knowledge. I need this reminding because for the past month the daily schedule and grim company of Work veterans have consumed me. He speaks to us for well over an hour. During the discourse,
his meaning seems clear but, as soon as he finishes, little sense of it remains. Only two concepts stay with me.
First, he warns us that we cannot be free until we are free of our petty likes and dislikes—toward people, things, activities.
“You will have many opportunities here to learn more about yourselves by opening to new experiences. You can learn much by choosing to do what is unappealing, attending to the people who don’t attract you, performing tasks you think you cannot do; in other words, by putting aside your usual inclinations. Ultimately, we must be capable of living the way we believe is just and loving.”
I recognize that by having agreed to be at Sherborne House, I am going to experience life in ways I might not allow myself under ordinary circumstances. The protected environment allows us freedom to conduct ourselves in a way that is different from our usual responses. There are no grades or prizes, no certificates of completion, no competition created by outer motivation. Theoretically, this should free me to try activities I do not know how to do and to experiment with my behavior toward people, as well.
Will I be able to make this year more meaningful than my past schooling where I didn’t like the way we studied history by memorizing dates and simplistic reasons given for the cause of that war instead of studying real documents and human behavior? And what about jobs where I spent hours filing papers or pasting in word corrections on supply catalogs? Then I thought about colleagues who gossiped and took pleasure in causing dissension. I wonder if I’ll have the courage to make choices based on my values instead of my preferences.
The second concept that Mr. B introduces might address some of my questions. He asks that in every situation and with every exercise we verify as far as possible whether our new activities serve the purposes and understanding we have determined for ourselves. What is our personal aim? This simple notion is to become our touchstone for evaluating everything, including the Work as we are being shown it. He also implies that by acting from our own conscience we will connect to a force beyond our comprehension.
You cannot get what you’ve never had unless you’re
willing to do what you’ve never done. _Mac Anderson
The same morning, the official beginning of the course, I have had a dream:
I discover I have a baby that Mr. and Mrs. Bennett have been caring for. After spending just a little time with it, I love it so much that I know I won’t ever be able to leave it again.
So once again, a sense of promise countered my discomfort with Sherborne’s atmosphere and we began the official program of physical labor and inner exercises that defined our lives there. This is how the daily activities were organized. The student body of one hundred and three people was divided into three groups of about 35 people each. Every day, one group was on house duty—cooking, cleaning, and childcare—while the other two groups attended classes—cosmology, psychology, movements, and lectures on other topics that weren’t necessarily ongoing. In the mornings, however, everyone worked in the garden or on property maintenance for two-and-a-half hours. Only those whose housekeeping tasks had to be performed during that time were excused. Lest we became too comfortable with our accomplices, we were forewarned that the groups would be reconstituted several times during the ten-month course. Since every student would play every role, by the end of the course we should have experienced all sides of every practical activity.
Warren, of the gray sweat suit and coke bottle glasses, is my group’s house supervisor the first Sunday of the course. It is his duty to allocate jobs the night before. Even though the full list of assignments doesn’t go up on the board that night, at least the morning servers and breakfast cooks are notified. The cooks have to put the huge pot of porridge on the coal burning Aga, a cast iron stove, to cook through the night.
Morning servers also have work to do the night before. Learning of this duty late in the evening takes them by surprise. They have to return to the dark dining hall long after dinner has been cleared. At this hour the dim lights feel eerie and the sound of utensils echo as they’re being set upon the tables in the deserted room.
We are told we may go to church on Sunday as long as we let the house supervisor know so he can assign us afternoon and evening chores. Although I’m Jewish, I decide to go, thinking I am already in need of another break since the one I took by going to Beshara was a couple of weeks ago. Going to church will provide a formal outlet for my spiritual yearnings, I decide.
When I inform Warren that night that I intend to go, he says okay. However, in the morning the list shows me assigned as lunch cook for which I need to work through most of the morning. Does he not realize that I need time to cook or is he purposely sabotaging my plans? I confront him by whining about it. He is unwilling, however, to make any changes and I feel stuck.
I remind myself of The Practice of the Presence of God and decide to follow Brother Lawrence’s simplicity of intention. Cooking the soup will be my Sunday prayers. I hold this thought in my mind as I cut and sauté the onions and carrots. In addition, I make it a point to pray hourly. So immersed in this assignment am I that I’m barely aware of the other cooks in the kitchen or what they are doing. The efforts do change my angry state and the soup turns out okay. Later in the day I apologize to Warren for what felt to me like lashing out at him.
Not more than a couple of months later into the course, I noticed that I was still carrying negativity toward Warren. By this time I’d seen at close quarters the variety of ways other people had solved similar problems. Instead of agreeing not to go to church when he’d scheduled me to work, I could have told him without any anger that he had made a mistake, that I had informed him the night before and he’d agreed to my going to church which I still intended to do. Then I could have gone off on my journey and let him deal with finding someone to take my place. Stating my position and doing what I thought fair without his agreement would never have occurred to me at that time.
As I imagined myself behaving differently, however, additional aspects to this incident became conspicuous. There was my need to get approval, for one, and if after presenting my case logically, I still didn’t get it, I would do as I was told while inwardly nurturing defeat and resentment.
In the case of my wanting to go to church, the purpose was to give myself a break when I felt like having one. Had guilt over this unstated purpose contributed to my lack of resolve about going? I wanted to think that giving myself a break was ‘taking care of myself,’ not just selfishly doing what I felt like.
Maybe I was afraid of having Warren, whom I didn’t even know, be angry with me. Or was I even more afraid he would report my shirking to Mr. Bennett? What if he disapproved? He could kick me out of the program. Or what if Warren didn’t assign another cook to take my place and I became the reason there was no soup for lunch? Then everyone might become furious with me.
All of these thoughts and more are what Mr. Bennett would have called ‘inner considering.’
Conscience is a mother-in-law whose visit never ends. _H.L. Mencken

March 12th, 2010 at 7:30 pm
This photograph has a very special quality for me. Can you say something about it?
March 12th, 2010 at 8:22 pm
A possible modification to the Mencken quote: “Inner considering is a mother-in-law whose visit never ends–unless you choose to kick her out. Conscience is a spark that illuminates corners you might prefer to keep dark, and motivates action you might not otherwise take.”
Your writing is vivid, immediate, and clear. It is a pleasure to read. Thank you so much.
Georgia+
March 13th, 2010 at 9:40 am
That is a well-known and much admired photograph entitled “Grand Descent to the Fried Egg.” It hangs in the classical wing of the MOMA in NYC. There are others in the series.
March 13th, 2010 at 2:06 pm
Soup, etc. We used to get into such a tizz at Claymont working to get meals prepared and served on time. Once, the blender shattered into pieces at the last minute and we had to improvise a soup fast. I was often tempted to let go and just let the meal happen, or not. It would have been quite an opportunity to experience the negativity of my hungry fellow students.
I am sorely tempted to add a small fried egg to each of your socks.
Thank you so much for this, Barbara.
March 13th, 2010 at 9:07 pm
On a lighter note: I remember the silent fasting time during the winter when both Dick Holland and JGB kept their dentures out for days at a time. It felt like the whole of Sherborne House had slid into a nightmare realm……….being constantly hungry, cold, cut off from human contact and frightened of what might happen next; all the while thinking and feeling and seeing inner worthlessness…………and being unable to have any spiritual insights or breakthroughs…….and having a really hard time remembering what ever possessed me to take a year of my life to be at this place……..….what awesome days they were!!
March 13th, 2010 at 9:14 pm
and then there was the time, a cold wet and muddy morning working in the gardens, coming in for lunch, looking forward to a hot meal with some substance to it, only to be served a quarter of a head of cabbage……..nothing else on the plate or in sight, just a slice of cabbage. It’s one of the few times in my life that I lusted for marmite on toast.
March 13th, 2010 at 11:24 pm
I am enjoying entering your year at Sherborne, and sharing so many impressions, outwardly and inwardly, that you so clearly describe. I look forward to the postings of the book, and the comments everyone shares.
March 14th, 2010 at 6:47 am
Hey Fish,
Hold on. She’s only just begun writing the exoteric though your poetry re winter
Is awesome. Did you ever see James Tomarelli put marmite on toast?
Best wishes,
Ken
March 14th, 2010 at 9:13 am
Fish- wasn’t the wedge lettuce and didn’t it have a blob of creamy dressing to cove up the bugs? (the lettuce was “bolting” and they wanted to pick and eat it quick before it went bitter) Yup, those were the days….
BJ- your dream about the baby makes me very happy for you
March 14th, 2010 at 10:24 pm
Speaking of unique meals and James T., I am reminded of a memorable meal served by James’s good friend Hutch at Claymont–a baked whole rutabega–one for each diner–no sauce included.
March 15th, 2010 at 1:44 am
Fish,
Roberta is correct: The lunch was halves of wedge lettuce–so many were bolting. There was some sort of odd dressing on each. You are certainly right that it was probably the low point in lunchtime cuisine. At least 2nd year.
Roberta, it is so strange not to call you “Bobbi Jo”–did you give that nickname up? By the way, do you remember that you and I were on one of the first breakfast details together, and I had no idea what we were doing. Thank goodness you did, but I think somehow the poridge went wrong. Or was it the toast? I think maybe it was the toast. We didn’t make enough, maybe?
Also, I remember that Olga, Mr. B’s secretary, was so troubled by how bad the tea was that morning that she came to me after breakfast and asked what we had done. Of course, we had done it all wrong and put the tea in after the hot water or some such thing. She said it was some of the worst tea she had ever tasted!
I also remember the day you and I were together, and I was uncertain about getting up on one of the ponies (or were they mules?), and you just said “get up” and I got up. It was a good ’shock’ and I thank you for it all these years later.
Barbara, you are bringing back singular memories. Many, many thanks.
March 27th, 2010 at 3:13 am
Smiling as I read through these posts about the food at Sherborne, all the while seeing a repeated reference to “Fish”.
Lashings of blue porridge, laced with love, to you Barbara.